Wallet Flag Check
SOLANA + 5 EVM CHAINS · SOURCED FACTS, NOT A SCORE
Check a wallet against independent flag databases before you trust or transact with it — Solana or EVM.
We check independent sources (GoPlus, Webacy, and ScamSniffer on EVM chains) and show each one's own facts separately — not merged into one invented score. A clean result means nothing in these databases, not a certified-safe verdict.
Which wallet are you checking?
Pick a chain and paste an address — I'll check it against independent flag databases.
What this actually checks
This looks up a wallet address — Solana or one of five EVM chains (Ethereum, Base, BSC, Arbitrum, Polygon) — against independent flag databases: GoPlus (18 malicious-address categories: phishing, mixers, sanctions, theft), Webacy (general threat analysis plus a dedicated sanctions-list check), and, on EVM chains, ScamSniffer's public phishing/drainer blacklist. We show each source's own facts separately, not merged into one invented score — they use different methodologies and scales, so combining them would manufacture a precision none of them actually has.
What "no flags found" means — and doesn't
A clean result means this address isn't in any of these databases right now. It does not mean the wallet is verified safe. Every source maintains its own list or model with unknown, possibly incomplete coverage — absence of a flag is the honest answer "nothing found," not a certification.
Why multiple sources instead of one
Webacy recognizes known exchange wallets (e.g. tagging an address as a Binance hot wallet) — useful context a raw balance or transaction count can't tell you. GoPlus separately checks 18 malicious-activity categories. On EVM chains, ScamSniffer adds a purpose-built phishing/drainer blacklist. Independent reads reduce the chance any single source's blind spot is the whole picture.
Checking a token, not a wallet?
This tool is for wallet addresses. For a token's mint/freeze authority, LP-lock %, and scam-pattern flags, use the Rug Pull Checker instead.
Check a token instead →Use via API or MCP
This check is available as a deterministic API call: useful for bots or wallets screening a counterparty address before a transaction.
What sources does this wallet check use?
GoPlus's malicious-address database (18 categories: phishing, mixers, sanctions, theft, and more), Webacy's address analysis plus dedicated sanctions-list check, and — on EVM chains — ScamSniffer's public phishing/drainer blacklist. Each is shown separately, sourced and attributed.
Does a clean result mean the wallet is safe?
No. It means none of these databases currently has this address flagged. Every source has its own coverage and blind spots — treat a clean result as "nothing found," not a certification of safety.
Why doesn't this give one combined risk score?
The sources use different methodologies and scales — Webacy's ML-based overall risk score isn't comparable to GoPlus's category checklist or ScamSniffer's binary blacklist. Merging them into one number would imply a precision none of them actually provides. We show each source's own facts instead.
Which chains are supported?
Solana and five EVM chains: Ethereum, Base, BSC, Arbitrum, and Polygon. ScamSniffer's blacklist is EVM-only (confirmed: its public database has zero Solana addresses), so that source only appears for EVM chains.
Can this check tokens as well as wallets?
No — for token-level checks (mint/freeze authority, LP lock, scam-pattern flags), use the Rug Pull Checker instead. This tool is specifically for wallet addresses.